by James Ley, John Heard, Geordie Williamson, D.G. Rogers, Beryl Doble, and Jane Woollard •
What’s your point?
Dear Editor,
John Carmody, in the June issue, writes a letter loaded with tendentious and pejorative language to accuse me of thundering and provocation in my review of Richard J. Lane’s Fifty Key Literary Theorists (March 2007). Carmody portrays me as self-satisfied in the same breath as he refers to his own wryness. He advises me to use words more ‘clearly and carefully’, and then composes a sentence in which ‘eliding’ creates a ‘mélange’. He charges me with portentousness in a letter that consists almost entirely of windy rhetorical questions. I have only one question: what is his point?
From the New Issue
Letters
A Life in Letters: A new light on Simone Weil by Robert Chevanier and André A. Devaux, translated from French by Nicholas Elliott
by Scott Stephens
You May Also Like
Television
: A vivid, much-needed perspective on Australia’s gold rush era by
by Giselle Au-Nhien Nguyen
If you are an ABR subscriber, you will need to sign in to post a comment.
If you have forgotten your sign in details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to ABR Comments. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.
Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.