Anyone who has found herself in a supermarket late on Thursday when a new checkout opens will have no trouble understanding why evolutionary biologists have struggled to explain the development of altruism in humans. In On Natural Selection, Darwin asserts: ‘In social animals [nature] will adapt the structure of each individual for the benefit of the community, if each in consequence profits by the selected change.’ Yet, practically, how could that adaptation first develop outside family groups? How could a lone altruist achieve anything but loss?
It required game theory to calculate how cooperating with strangers could help survival. Classic game theory asks you to imagine yourself in solitary confinement in a Ruritanian prison, charged with plotting against the state. The state is holding another prisoner in a different cell. The state does not have enough evidence to convict either of you (for this to work, you have to recall a time before the ‘war on terror’, when lack of evidence might have constituted a problem for the state). If you both confess, you will both get ten years. If only you confess, she will get twenty years and you will go free, and vice versa. If neither of you confesses, you will both get out after just six months. Do you confess?
On The Origin of Stories: Evolution, cognition, and fiction by Brian Boyd
Harvard University Press (Inbooks), $69.95 hb, 540 pp, 9780674033573
ABR receives a commission on items purchased through this link. All ABR reviews are fully independent.
If you are an ABR subscriber, you will need to sign in to post a comment.
If you have forgotten your sign in details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to ABR Comments. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.
Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.